Bill
2024
2023C
2023
2023B
2022A
2022O
2022D
2022C
2022
2021B
2021A
2021
2020O
2020
2019
2018O
2018
2017A
2017
2016O
2016
2015C
2015B
2015A
2015
2014O
2014A
2014
2013
2012O
2012B
2012
2011
2010A
2010O
2010C
2010
2009B
2009
2009A
2008O
2008
2007D
2007C
2007B
2007
2007A
2006O
2006
2005B
2005
2004A
2004O
2004
2003E
2003D
2003C
2003B
2003A
2003
2002O
2002E
2002D
2002
2001C
2001B
2001
2001A
2000
2000A
1999
1998
Search
Statute
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Search
Site
Search
FLORIDA HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES
Site Search
Search
Find Bill
2024
2023C
2023
2023B
2022A
2022O
2022D
2022C
2022
2021B
2021A
2021
2020O
2020
2019
2018O
2018
2017A
2017
2016O
2016
2015C
2015B
2015A
2015
2014O
2014A
2014
2013
2012O
2012B
2012
2011
2010A
2010O
2010C
2010
2009B
2009
2009A
2008O
2008
2007D
2007C
2007B
2007
2007A
2006O
2006
2005B
2005
2004A
2004O
2004
2003E
2003D
2003C
2003B
2003A
2003
2002O
2002E
2002D
2002
2001C
2001B
2001
2001A
2000
2000A
1999
1998
Search
Find Statute
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Search
Home
Bills
Representatives
Committees
Leadership
House Schedule
Publications
Tracking
Home
Bills
Floor Vote
Floor Vote for
Bill Number:
0703
Date:
Tuesday, January 09, 2024
Reading #:
2
Barcode #:
NA
Sequence:
530
In the Chair:
Clemons
Floor Actions:
Adoption
-
Abbott
Y
Altman
Y
Alvarez
Y
Amesty
Y
Anderson
-
Andrade
N
Antone
N
Arrington
Y
Baker
Y
Bankson
Y
Barnaby
N
Bartleman
Y
Basabe
Y
Bell
Y
Beltran
N
Benjamin
Y
Berfield
Y
Black
Y
Borrero
Y
Botana
Y
Brackett
N
Bracy Davis
Y
Brannan
Y
Buchanan
Y
Busatta Cabrera
N
Campbell
Y
Canady
Y
Caruso
N
Casello
N
Cassel
Y
Chamberlin
N
Chambliss
Y
Chaney
Y
Clemons
N
Cross
N
Daley
N
Daniels
N
Driskell
Y
Duggan
N
Dunkley
N
Edmonds
N
Eskamani
Y
Esposito
Y
Fabricio
Y
Fine
-
Franklin
N
Gantt
Y
Garcia
Y
Garrison
Y
Giallombardo
Y
Gonzalez Pittman
Y
Gossett-Seidman
N
Gottlieb
Y
Grant
Y
Gregory
-
Griffitts
N
Harris
N
Hart
-
Hinson
Y
Holcomb
N
Hunschofsky
Y
Jacques
N
Joseph
Y
Killebrew
Y
Koster
Y
LaMarca
Y
Leek
N
López, J.
Y
Lopez, V.
Y
Maggard
Y
Maney
Y
Massullo
Y
McClain
Y
McClure
Y
McFarland
Y
Melo
Y
Michael
Y
Mooney
N
Nixon
Y
Overdorf
Y
Payne
Y
Perez
Y
Persons-Mulicka
Y
Plakon
Y
Plasencia
Y
Porras
N
Rayner
Y
Redondo
Y
Renner
Y
Rizo
Y
Roach
N
Robinson, F.
Y
Robinson, W.
Y
Rommel
Y
Roth
Y
Rudman
Y
Salzman
Y
Shoaf
N
Silvers
Y
Sirois
N
Skidmore
Y
Smith
Y
Snyder
Y
Stark
Y
Steele
Y
Stevenson
N
Tant
Y
Temple
Y
Tomkow
Y
Trabulsy
Y
Tramont
Y
Truenow
Y
Tuck
N
Valdés
N
Waldron
N
Williams
N
Woodson
Y
Yarkosky
-
Yeager
Total Yeas:
80
Total Nays:
33
Total Abstained:
0
Total Missed:
6
Total Votes:
113
Vote After Roll Call:
Yeas
Abbott
01/10/2024 11:04:04 AM
Andrade
01/09/2024 04:23:19 PM
Griffitts
01/11/2024 01:35:58 PM
Nays
Hinson
01/22/2024 11:59:07 AM
Explanations of Vote:
Beltran -
I was not allocated time to debate and so I am sharing my thoughts here. Our national government deserves the same control limiting spending in Florida. For the last half century, the federal government has spent in nearly perpetual deficit. Our prodigal Congress invariably creates debt to be repaid by those who cannot yet vote – future generations. If we do not balance our budget on our own terms and timing, it will eventually be balanced for us. This will inevitably coincide with and compound another national challenge, when our need to spend will be most acute, and creditors, foreign and domestic, will refuse to lend to our government on reasonable terms under those circumstances. Our borrowing creates attractive yields for foreign investors, creating demand for dollars relative to other currencies. This enables currency manipulation by our political and economic adversaries and results in weak foreign currencies, thus disadvantaging American manufacturing. Stated differently, our fiscal deficit crowds out purchases of American products and exacerbates our trade deficit. Interest on our debt accumulated through decades of deficit spending is now itself a fiscal issue. Servicing and retiring the $34 trillion we now owe will be challenging enough. We must stop further increases.
Eskamani -
Under Article V of the U.S. Constitution, Congress is required to hold a constitutional convention if two-thirds of state legislatures (34 states) call for one. And despite what my colleagues say, there are absolutely no rules for an Article V Convention outlined in the Constitution. This means the group of people convening to rewrite our Constitution could be totally unelected and unaccountable. There is nothing that could limit the convention to a single issue, so the delegates could write amendments that revoke any of our most cherished rights – like our right to peaceful protest, our freedom of religion, or our right to privacy. There are also no rules preventing corporations from pouring money into the convention to ensure they get their way. I cannot in good faith vote for this measure, as it could endanger our entire Constitutional Republic and lead to a dramatic re-writing of the U.S. Constitution.
Subscribe:
Modal title
×